A recent lawsuit alleges that Starbucks falsely advertised eight protein beverages as “sugar-free” when they actually contain between 13 and 21 grams of sugar per venti-size serving due to the natural sugar in milk. The lawsuit accuses Starbucks of taking advantage of the protein trend and customer preferences.
Starbucks has defended itself, stating that it has provided clear information on its protein beverages, sugar-free options, and nutritional content. However, the lawsuit argues that calling these beverages “Sugar-Free” is misleading, as they contain lactose, a naturally occurring sugar in milk.
Federal laws in the U.S. and Canada set limits on what can be labeled as “sugar-free.” The lawsuit seeks damages for false advertising and violations of consumer protection laws. It also aims to be certified as a class-action lawsuit and demands a jury trial.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of consumers who purchased Starbucks’s sugar-free protein drinks in California, New York, and Washington. Consumers, especially those with health concerns like diabetes, rely on accurate labeling when making purchasing decisions.