Five former chairs of a group advising the federal government on endangered species have jointly penned an open letter expressing worries about proposed alterations to the Species At Risk Act. They suggest that these changes could lead to the deliberate extinction of endangered species in Canada. The scientists, who previously led the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), argue that over 600 species are currently protected under the law. However, modifications being considered by the government could render the act ineffective, as noted in a recent press release authored by the scientists.
The letter, addressed to the federal government last month, emphasizes the importance of protecting endangered species and preventing their extinction. COSEWIC, an independent advisory panel responsible for evaluating species facing extinction, plays a crucial role in recommending species for protection under the endangered species law. The scientists decided to make their concerns public to raise awareness and prevent Canadians from inadvertently contributing to the deliberate extinction of wildlife species in the country.
The letter coincides with the government’s review of environmental regulations, including the Species At Risk Act. Proposed changes aim to streamline project approvals and construction processes, potentially undermining the protection of endangered species. Notably, the alterations could eliminate the requirement for a “jeopardy test,” a crucial assessment under the law that safeguards species and their habitats from harm if their survival is at risk.
David Green, a prominent biologist and one of the former COSEWIC chairs involved in the letter, criticized the proposed changes, labeling them as detrimental to endangered species’ protection. He emphasized the significance of jeopardy tests as a final line of defense for species in need of protection, highlighting their essential role in preserving biodiversity.
In addition to jeopardizing species protection, the proposed revisions grant significant powers to the government, enabling the establishment of “federal economic zones” for pre-approved industrial development and fast-tracking project approvals, including pipelines. These changes, outlined in Bill C-5, have raised concerns among environmental experts due to their potential impact on wildlife and habitats.
The scientists specifically highlighted the threat posed by a proposed West Coast oil pipeline, which could have severe consequences for species protected under the act, such as the southern resident killer whale and Chinook salmon. The pipeline’s construction could lead to habitat destruction and noise pollution, endangering the survival of these species in the Salish Sea region.
The scientists’ letter questions the government’s priorities and underscores the importance of safeguarding endangered species for future generations. Green expressed his disappointment with the proposed changes, noting the government’s shift from its previous commitment to species protection. Kathryn Harrison, a UBC professor specializing in climate and energy politics, highlighted the unprecedented nature of the legislative changes, emphasizing the need for careful consideration and public consultation.
Despite the scientists’ concerns, the government has yet to respond to the open letter. The Privy Council Office reiterated the government’s commitment to species conservation but did not confirm whether they had received the scientists’ correspondence. The government’s rationale for the proposed changes revolves around economic growth and trade diversification amid ongoing trade tensions with the U.S.
In light of the public outcry and extended engagement period, the government plans to release a report summarizing feedback from Canadians before proceeding with any legislative changes. While formal legislation is expected after Parliament reconvenes in September, environmental advocates urge the government to reconsider its approach and prioritize species conservation to prevent irreversible harm to Canada’s biodiversity.