More than 400,000 individuals have supported a petition opposing the potential implementation of digital ID cards by Keir Starmer. Concerns raised by critics include worries about privacy and the risk of data breaches, despite recent surveys indicating public favor for national ID cards. An e-petition on the Parliament website has gathered hundreds of thousands of signatures against the policy, with a rapid addition of 50,000 signatures in just over 40 minutes.
The total signatures surpassed 420,000 by late Thursday, although the authenticity of all signatories is uncertain. Data from the House of Commons website suggested a portion of signatures originated from overseas. The Prime Minister is expected to confirm plans for a “Brit card” on Friday, amid concerns that the underground economy is luring Channel migrants to attempt crossings via small boats.
Richard Tice from Reform criticized the proposed scheme as costly and time-consuming, estimating that the digital ID project would require billions of pounds and years to implement. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy highlighted potential benefits of digital IDs, such as facilitating legal employment verification and enhancing citizen access to services like the NHS app.
Amidst varying opinions on the digital ID proposal, Sir David cautioned about the risks associated with mishandling data and the potential consequences for public trust. The suggested system would mandate individuals to present digital ID cards when starting new jobs, allowing officials to verify their eligibility to work in the UK. The Labour leader reportedly reconsidered the plan following input from influential figures, including French President Emmanuel Macron.
Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick criticized Starmer’s approach, emphasizing the need to address root issues in the legal system instead of relying solely on ID checks. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of mandating digital IDs, calling for a comprehensive national debate on the matter. Former Home Office minister Tom Pursglove and Reform UK also criticized the proposal as a misleading tactic in addressing illegal immigration concerns.